Paper by John R Hibbing et al: “Relative to the well-developed theory and extensive survey batteries on people’s preferences for substantive policy solutions, scholarly understanding of people’s preferences for the mechanisms by which policies should be adopted is disappointing. Theory rarely goes beyond the assumption that people would prefer to rule themselves rather than leave decisions up to elites and measurement rests largely on four items that are not up to the task. In this article, we seek to provide a firmer footing for “process” research by 1) offering an alternative theory holding that people actually want elites to continue to make important political decisions but want them to do so only after acquiring a deep appreciation for the real-world problems facing regular people, and 2) developing and testing a battery of over 50 survey items, appropriate for cross-national research, that extend understanding of how the people want political decisions to be made…(More)”.
How to contribute:
Did you come across – or create – a compelling project/report/book/app at the leading edge of innovation in governance?
Share it with us at info@thelivinglib.org so that we can add it to the Collection!
About the author
Get the latest news right in you inbox
Subscribe to curated findings and actionable knowledge from The Living Library, delivered to your inbox every Friday
Related articles
INSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION
Why PeaceTech must be the next frontier of innovation and investment
Posted in June 18, 2025 by Stefaan Verhulst
artificial intelligence
Sharing trustworthy AI models with privacy-enhancing technologies
Posted in June 17, 2025 by Stefaan Verhulst
INSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION
2025 State of the Digital Decade
Posted in June 17, 2025 by Stefaan Verhulst