Tina Nabatchi, Emma Ertinger and Matt Leighninger in Conflict Resolution Quaterly: “In the late 1980s and early 1990s, conflict resolution practitioners faced a dilemma: they understood how to design better ADR processes but were often unsure of their authority to offer ADR and were entrenched in systems that made it difficult to use ADR. Today, public participation faces a similar dilemma. We know what good participation looks like, but using better participation is challenging because of legal and systemic impediments. This need not be the case. In this article, we assert that tapping the full potential of public participation requires better designs, better laws, and better systems….(More)”
How to contribute:
Did you come across – or create – a compelling project/report/book/app at the leading edge of innovation in governance?
Share it with us at info@thelivinglib.org so that we can add it to the Collection!
About the author
Get the latest news right in you inbox
Subscribe to curated findings and actionable knowledge from The Living Library, delivered to your inbox every Friday
Related articles
citizen engagement
Making Civic Trust Less Abstract: A Framework for Measuring Trust Within Cities
Posted in June 5, 2025 by Stefaan Verhulst
artificial intelligence
The AI Policy Playbook
Posted in June 5, 2025 by Stefaan Verhulst
DATA
Europe’s dream to wean off US tech gets reality check
Posted in June 5, 2025 by Stefaan Verhulst